Tuesday, July 24, 2007

It's about the Security of America, Stupid!

"Pat Campbell" <pat@540wfla.com> Subject: It's about the Security, Stupid! During the Clinton campaign of 1992, the chant, motto or slogan wasalways popping up, "it's the economy, stupid." and this was a campaignagainst another George Bush. Let's leave Mexico out of this briefly, let's forget the sexual predator who was released by a judge because they couldn't find a translator, and let's set aside our President's penchant for appeasing the Mexican government over and above that of our ownthe citizens. Let's just consider the security of our nation.
We have an enemy that cannot be reasoned with, cannot be appeased, and whose ultimate goal is the death and destruction of all Jews and all Americans, anyone who isn't a Muslim is on their list of hated infidels. Now, let's add to that the recent news that Bin Ladin has bee special permission to target American children for death, two million or so. This has been done by a cleric in Saudi Arabia. Now, let's add the fact that Iraqi Muslims are paying the Mexican coyotes more to get smuggled across our borders than the Mexicans will. Okay what about the refusal of Bush's administration to limit the number of visitors from obviously hostile nations, let's put that in there too. (Gee, we wouldn't want to offend the "peaceful muslims" that want to see Disney, would we?)
Now consider the Senators who actually defeated the John Doe law which protects someone who reports suspicious activity to the authorities. In this case the GOP, with the singular exception of the coward Brownback, voted to support the law. And Barak Hussein Obama voted against it. Osama La Bamba, the muslim presidential hopeful, who is sneaking across the border of truth and lies in his quest to bring America much needed sympathy to the cause of Islam. Could it be that he doesn't want to antagonize the Muslim community that would help put him in the Whitehouse? Make no mistake about where Hussein's loyalties lie, once a muslim, always a muslim, especially in the formative years.
If our borders are not closed soon, there will be another attack, one aimed at our children and Mexico be damned, it's about the security of our nation, stupid! The fight is not over simply because we have had a victory against Mel's bill, this time. The continued bending over and grabbing our ankles policy on immigration this administration has will be the reason that innocent children are killed by a group of soulless monsters intent on gaining 72 virgins and a paradise. When this happens, the American people are going to rise up against George, Mel, Ted and all those others who refused to lift a finger to protect us in the name of making the Mexican government content. And when this happens, God help the Muslim community who refused to stand up and fight against these monsters, whether because they silently agreed with them, or out of fear of reprisals it won't matter, because this country will never be the same for them.
You know, people, Whether they are a Democrat or a Republicana, if they are part of the problem, toss them out now! Its about Restoring Common Sense to Washington - Whether They Like It Or Not. Dave Roberts for Senate 2010! Vote for anyone not a permenant fixture in the Halls of Congress in Washington.
If America wants to live into prosperity, we need to vote against the old furniture laying around in the Capital. We have inherited the worse of the worst to the names of Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Diane Fienstien, Mel Martinez, Bill Nelson, Lindsay Graham, Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, John Murtha, these people thhink we are to stupid to discern for ourselves. The threat of Osama Barak Huissein wah tusi, Hillary Clinton is very real, just like the audience for the duncette Rosi O'Dumbell, just listen to the clapping and laughing of the audiences.
I relish Mike Savage for president, no joke he is better relief then the dodo birds like Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Diane Fienstien, Mel Martinez, Bill Nelson, Lindsay Graham, Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, John Murtha you know the crew.

Friday, July 20, 2007

THE NAYS HAVE IT--THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DOES NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL "SAFE"

THE NAYS HAVE IT--THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DOES NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL "SAFE" TO REPORT IT IF YOU SUSPECT MUSLIM TERROR ACTIVITY

HOWEVER THE YAYS BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLES IS, YES,YES,YES, FOR THE JOHN DOE LAW SO WE CANNOT HAVE THE MUSLIM KILL US ALL..

IF YOU FOLLOW THE KOPRAN THEY ARE THE ENEMY, GET IT Democrats on the House/Senate conference committee have dropped from the Homeland Security bill the provision that would protect "John Doe" citizens from lawsuits when they report suspicious behavior to the authorities.

This is a good example of how Congress really works. The "John Doe" measure passed the House on a 304-121 vote, which means that many Democrats didn't want to go on record as opposing the measure. Instead, they killed it quietly in conference committee. So now Democrats in "swing" districts--those must be the ones where voters take seriously the risk of terrorist attack--can tell voters that they voted for the measure, and take no responsibility for the fact it never became law. This dodge is as old as the Republic.
It also shows the importance of party affiliation. If the Republicans still controlled Congress, a majority of conferees never would have voted to strip "John Doe" protection out of the bill.

AS GOD IS MY WITNESS IF YOU DEMS DO NOT VOTE THIS LAW INTO LAW OF THE LAND WE WILL VOTE YOU ALL OUT. YOU ARE ALL ENDANGERED SPECIES ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET ANYTHING DONE

PS. House Democrats are trying to block a provision in a homeland security bill that would protect the public from being sued by the likes of CAIR if they report suspicious behavior: Democrats want ‘John Doe’ provision cut. The legislation, which moves to a House and Senate conference committee this afternoon, will implement final recommendations from the 911 Commission.

Rep. Pete King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Rep. Steve Pearce, New Mexico Republican, sponsored the bill after a group of Muslim imams filed a lawsuit against U.S. Airways and unknown or “John Doe” passengers after they were removed for suspicious behavior aboard Flight 300 from Minneapolis to Phoenix on Nov. 20 before their removal.

“Democrats are trying to find any technical excuse to keep immunity out of the language of the bill to protect citizens, who in good faith, report suspicious activity to police or law enforcement,” Mr. King said in an interview last night. “This is a slap in the face of good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward, and it caves in to radical Islamists,” Mr. King said.
“I don’t see how you can have a homeland security bill without protecting people who come forward to report suspicious activity,” Mr. King said. Republicans aides say they will put up a fight with Democrats when the conference committee begins at 1 p.m., to reinsert the language, but that public pressure is also needed.

Emphasis Charles Johnson's. But the emphasis is very appropriate: get on the phone and internet NOW and call your Congressman and also Nancy Pelosi. Michelle Malkin adds:
Congress switchboard: 202-224-3121 Nancy Pelosi’s office: 202-225-4965

Fresh from their all-night effort to force surrender on the U.S. military in Iraq, some Democrats on Capitol Hill appear intent on using the dark-of-night (figuratively, if not literally) to another, grievous misdeed: Trying to eliminate one of the most important anti-terror provisions adopted by Congress since 9/11. This legislation is the so-called “King amendment,” which is designed to ensure that public-spirited citizens are not discouraged, let alone penalized, for doing their civic duty by informing the authorities of activities that could be associated with terrorism.

As the brilliant former counterterrorism prosecutor and legal analyst Andy McCarthy observes in a posting on National Review Online today, the King amendment’s opponents in the congressional leadership understand that the overwhelming, bipartisan support for this legislation in the House and Senate leave them few options. In fact, as a practical matter, the only way they could dispose of a provision which was initiated by the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Pete King of New York, after the insidious Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) brought suit against several “John Does” and adopted by the House of Representatives by a vote of 304-121 would be to snuff it in a conference committee. Word on the Hill is that it could be attempted TODAY.

Such a gambit should be made more difficult by the inclusion of similar language in the Senate version of what has come to be called the “9/11 Bill,” thanks to strong support in that chamber from, among others, Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and his ranking minority member, Susan Collins of Maine. Still, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants are reportedly hoping to use a technicality – the fact that the King amendment was to a railroad security bill rather than the 9/11 bill – to strip it from the conference report. By so doing, the minority of the House that voted against the King amendment and that is made up of most radical left-wing members of their caucus would have the last word, to the delight of their Islamist friends at CAIR.

Making such a point of order would, of course mean that a similar objection could be registered to every other aspect of the railroad legislation – which includes a number of provisions near-and-dear to the hearts of Democrats, as well as Republicans on the conference committee. Unless, that is, no one is paying attention and the dastardly deed can be accomplished behind closed doors and out of the glare the public’s eye.
Thanks to Andy McCarthy for raising the alarm. Every one of us who understands the indispensable role alert private citizens can – and must – play in protecting the American people from future terrorist attacks should immediately contact Speaker Pelosi’s office (202-225-4965), their own congressional representatives and their favorite talk radio show hosts and bloggers. The message should be clear: Enact the King amendment – because our lives, literally, depend upon it.
I AM AN AMERICAN, SCREW YOU CAIR, I REPORT WHO EVER I FEEL IS SUSPICIOUS AND I INVITE ANY MUSLIM TO SUE ME. SUE FOR WHAT? MY TWO POLYESTER SHIRTS. MAYBE A MUSLIM WOULD BE INTERESTED IN A GOOD PAIR OF PATENT LEATHER PLATFORM SHOES. IF CAIR OR ANY MUSLIMS ARE SUCCESSFUL IN A LAWSUIT AGAINST ME I APPEAL, EVERY SINGLE, FASCET OF THE CASE ONE AFTER THE OTHER UNTIL I GOT BORED, I WILL STALL UNTIL THE DAY BEFORE I WOULD HAVE TO MAKE GOOD ON THE JUDGMENT AND THEN I WOULD FILE BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 7.
BY THAT TIME I SHOULD BE WEARING A TOE TAG, AND THEN i WISH YOU ALL LUCK ON PROBATE.

September 11 2001

September 11 2001
Never Ever Forget nor Forgive

Favorite Books

  • Brutally Frank, Marshall Frank
  • Caveat, Alexander Haig
  • Florida Practice and Procedures, Trawick
  • In Defense of Internment, Michelle Malkin
  • In Mortal Danger, Tom Tancredo
  • Invasion, Michelle Marklin
  • Minutemen, Jim Gilchrist & Jerome R. Corsi
  • The 911 Report
  • The Death of the West, P. Buchanan
  • The Enemy Within, Michael Savage
  • The Secrets of the Kingdom, G. Posner
  • Truth About Muhammad, Robert Spencer

Nothing is left for the virgins?

Nothing is left for the virgins?
The future of the explosives belt