THE NAYS HAVE IT--THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DOES NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL "SAFE"

THE NAYS HAVE IT--THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DOES NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL "SAFE" TO REPORT IT IF YOU SUSPECT MUSLIM TERROR ACTIVITY

HOWEVER THE YAYS BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLES IS, YES,YES,YES, FOR THE JOHN DOE LAW SO WE CANNOT HAVE THE MUSLIM KILL US ALL..

IF YOU FOLLOW THE KOPRAN THEY ARE THE ENEMY, GET IT Democrats on the House/Senate conference committee have dropped from the Homeland Security bill the provision that would protect "John Doe" citizens from lawsuits when they report suspicious behavior to the authorities.

This is a good example of how Congress really works. The "John Doe" measure passed the House on a 304-121 vote, which means that many Democrats didn't want to go on record as opposing the measure. Instead, they killed it quietly in conference committee. So now Democrats in "swing" districts--those must be the ones where voters take seriously the risk of terrorist attack--can tell voters that they voted for the measure, and take no responsibility for the fact it never became law. This dodge is as old as the Republic.
It also shows the importance of party affiliation. If the Republicans still controlled Congress, a majority of conferees never would have voted to strip "John Doe" protection out of the bill.

AS GOD IS MY WITNESS IF YOU DEMS DO NOT VOTE THIS LAW INTO LAW OF THE LAND WE WILL VOTE YOU ALL OUT. YOU ARE ALL ENDANGERED SPECIES ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET ANYTHING DONE

PS. House Democrats are trying to block a provision in a homeland security bill that would protect the public from being sued by the likes of CAIR if they report suspicious behavior: Democrats want ‘John Doe’ provision cut. The legislation, which moves to a House and Senate conference committee this afternoon, will implement final recommendations from the 911 Commission.

Rep. Pete King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Rep. Steve Pearce, New Mexico Republican, sponsored the bill after a group of Muslim imams filed a lawsuit against U.S. Airways and unknown or “John Doe” passengers after they were removed for suspicious behavior aboard Flight 300 from Minneapolis to Phoenix on Nov. 20 before their removal.

“Democrats are trying to find any technical excuse to keep immunity out of the language of the bill to protect citizens, who in good faith, report suspicious activity to police or law enforcement,” Mr. King said in an interview last night. “This is a slap in the face of good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward, and it caves in to radical Islamists,” Mr. King said.
“I don’t see how you can have a homeland security bill without protecting people who come forward to report suspicious activity,” Mr. King said. Republicans aides say they will put up a fight with Democrats when the conference committee begins at 1 p.m., to reinsert the language, but that public pressure is also needed.

Emphasis Charles Johnson's. But the emphasis is very appropriate: get on the phone and internet NOW and call your Congressman and also Nancy Pelosi. Michelle Malkin adds:
Congress switchboard: 202-224-3121 Nancy Pelosi’s office: 202-225-4965

Fresh from their all-night effort to force surrender on the U.S. military in Iraq, some Democrats on Capitol Hill appear intent on using the dark-of-night (figuratively, if not literally) to another, grievous misdeed: Trying to eliminate one of the most important anti-terror provisions adopted by Congress since 9/11. This legislation is the so-called “King amendment,” which is designed to ensure that public-spirited citizens are not discouraged, let alone penalized, for doing their civic duty by informing the authorities of activities that could be associated with terrorism.

As the brilliant former counterterrorism prosecutor and legal analyst Andy McCarthy observes in a posting on National Review Online today, the King amendment’s opponents in the congressional leadership understand that the overwhelming, bipartisan support for this legislation in the House and Senate leave them few options. In fact, as a practical matter, the only way they could dispose of a provision which was initiated by the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Pete King of New York, after the insidious Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) brought suit against several “John Does” and adopted by the House of Representatives by a vote of 304-121 would be to snuff it in a conference committee. Word on the Hill is that it could be attempted TODAY.

Such a gambit should be made more difficult by the inclusion of similar language in the Senate version of what has come to be called the “9/11 Bill,” thanks to strong support in that chamber from, among others, Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and his ranking minority member, Susan Collins of Maine. Still, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants are reportedly hoping to use a technicality – the fact that the King amendment was to a railroad security bill rather than the 9/11 bill – to strip it from the conference report. By so doing, the minority of the House that voted against the King amendment and that is made up of most radical left-wing members of their caucus would have the last word, to the delight of their Islamist friends at CAIR.

Making such a point of order would, of course mean that a similar objection could be registered to every other aspect of the railroad legislation – which includes a number of provisions near-and-dear to the hearts of Democrats, as well as Republicans on the conference committee. Unless, that is, no one is paying attention and the dastardly deed can be accomplished behind closed doors and out of the glare the public’s eye.

Thanks to Andy McCarthy for raising the alarm. Every one of us who understands the indispensable role alert private citizens can – and must – play in protecting the American people from future terrorist attacks should immediately contact Speaker Pelosi’s office (202-225-4965), their own congressional representatives and their favorite talk radio show hosts and bloggers. The message should be clear: Enact the King amendment – because our lives, literally, depend upon it.

I AM AN AMERICAN, SCREW YOU CAIR, I REPORT WHO EVER I FEEL IS SUSPICIOUS AND I INVITE ANY MUSLIM TO SUE ME. SUE FOR WHAT? MY TWO POLYESTER SHIRTS. MAYBE A MUSLIM WOULD BE INTERESTED IN A GOOD PAIR OF PATENT LEATHER PLATFORM SHOES. IF CAIR OR ANY MUSLIMS ARE SUCCESSFUL IN A LAWSUIT AGAINST ME I APPEAL, EVERY SINGLE, FASCET OF THE CASE ONE AFTER THE OTHER UNTIL I GOT BORED, I WILL STALL UNTIL THE DAY BEFORE I WOULD HAVE TO MAKE GOOD ON THE JUDGMENT AND THEN I WOULD FILE BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 7.

BY THAT TIME I SHOULD BE WEARING A TOE TAG, AND THEN i WISH YOU ALL LUCK ON PROBATE.