McCain! "I would sign an amnesty Bill if it came across my desk" January 27 2008

McCain! "I would sign an amnesty Bill if it came across my desk" Janary 27 2008.

I am amazed how people are so short sighted. If Immigration is in the forfront of 9 out of 10 people' minds. How is it possible that McCain is on the board as a contender.

It is illegal immigration that is one of the cornerstones of the bankruptcy that is heading our way. The economic depression we are in is fueled by illegal immigration. To look the other way, to do the shoulder shrugging, to allow the santuary of illegal immigration should be a thing of the past, McCain cannot be the president elect.

My grandfather use to tell me, Do not lend an ear to what people say but keep an eyeball on what they do. McCain is the high priest of the amnesty bill that was sent to hell by the voters last year. McCain will, I repeat, will instill amnesty contrary to what the voter believes and wants. McCain says it, no doubt, he is for amnesty.

On Sundays television show with Tim Russert, he said he would sign any bill coming across his desk...legalizing the illegals. What more do you need to see, he just spoke his conviction.McCain is one of those people in Washington that thinks the voting public is to stupid and its McCain's duty to shove amnesty down the voters throat. You can forget any fence to, if McCain is our president.

He is right in a way. The people who vote him in, Are so stupid that a man like McCain can surmise that amnesty is the right and just way to handle the illegal immigration question.After all the voters are so stupid to put McCain in the white house, why not give amnesty to the illegals.

From McCains point of view...Americans must have wanted amnesty for the illegals, after all.......the voters elected me.

Obama Muslim roots no questions? Romney's Mormon scrutiny? why?

America the feel good, fantasy, politicians singing there songs. Hello Suckers, can you dig it, can u dig it, we need to fight for turf, the precious little turf. America is up for sale.

Obama, the Muslim fake christian wannabe, promises change. He could not change his deodorant without help from the misses. You know what gets me about the fools that vote. They believe guys like Obama, Hillary, Rudy, and the king dunce Ron Paul.

In a recent analysis, “Was Barack Obama a Muslim?” THE evidence and found it suggests “Obama was born a Muslim to a non-practicing Muslim father and for some years had a reasonably Muslim upbringing under the auspices of his Indonesian step-father.”
· “Interviews with dozens of former classmates, teachers, neighbors and friends show that Obama was not a regular practicing Muslim when he was in Indonesia” – implying he was an irregularly practicing Muslim.
· “Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers, a few neighbors said” – confirming that he did pray in the mosque.
· “Obama’s 3rd-grade teacher at the Catholic school, who lived near the family [said that] ‘Rarely, Barry went to the mosque with Lolo’” – confirming that Obama attended mosque services.
All this matters, for if Obama once was a Muslim, he is now what Islamic law calls a murtadd (apostate), an ex-Muslim converted to another religion who must be executed. Were he elected president of the United States, this status, clearly, would have large potential implications for his relationship with the Muslim world.

The only real change needed in Washington is not in the hands of the President. We will change the stooge there now in 2008 and if we are not careful we could wind up with a replacement stooge like Obama, Hillary, Rudy, and the king dunce Ron Paul.

The change needed in Washington is in the hands of the Voters not the President. DON'T MARCH ON WASHINGTON TO HAVE YOUR VOICE HEARD, MARCH OVER TO THE VOTING BOOTH, get even vote for anyone but the known do nothings. We need to get rid of the permanent fixtures in Washington.

Vote out the Harry Ried, Pelosi, Boxer, Fienstien, Dick Turbin, Leaky Leahy, who gets under cover people killed. As a New Yorker I find it hard to believe Chuck Schummer gets 75% of the vote. Who runs against him? A stiff out of the morgue. Really the demographics is not there, for 75% of the election.

Change, yes the voters need to make that change not Obama. You know what troubles me is why the big deal on the media over the Mormon Mr Romney. No one hammers the facts that Obama, and IN HIS FORMATIVE YEARS, STUDIED AS A MUSLIM.
That's going to make a big difference in the near future when we fight the Islamo Fascists like we did the enemy in World War II. Oops you found me out, Obama will never be elected anyway.

Interogate the Interogators

The Justice Department opened a full criminal investigation Wednesday into the destruction
of CIA interrogation videotapes.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey announced that he was appointing John Durham, a federal
prosecutor in Connecticut, to oversee the investigation of a case that has challenged the Bush administration's controversial handling of terrorism suspects.

The CIA acknowledged last month that in 2005 it destroyed videos of officers using tough interrogation methods while questioning two al-Qaida suspects. The acknowledgment sparked a
congressional inquiry and a preliminary investigation by Justice into whether the CIA violated any laws or obstructed congressional inquiries such as the one led by the Sept. 11 Commission. So what,and why is this garbage allowed to continue.

"The Department's National Security Division has recommended, and I have concluded, that here is a basis for initiating a criminal investigation of this matter, and I have taken steps to begin that investigation," Mukasey said in a statement released Wednesday. Your wrong. You need to do whatever it takes to extract information stupid.

Durham, who has served with the Justice Department for 25 years, has a reputation as one of the nation's most relentless prosecutors. He was appointed to investigate the FBI's use of mob informants in Boston, an investigation that sent former FBI agent John Connolly to prison. What does that have to do with the CIA interrogation methods, is beyond me.

"Nobody in this country is above the law, an FBI agent or otherwise," Durham said in 2002 after Connolly's conviction. Really, how about the illegals using everyone Else's social. How about dirty money in campaign financing of the Clinton's, or how about Fienstien's husband and the military contacts insider trading. I could go on and on.

Mukasey made the move after prosecutors from the Eastern District of Virginia, which includes the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Va., removed themselves from the case. CIA Inspector General John L. Helgerson, who worked with the Justice Department on the preliminary inquiry, also removed himself. I wonder why?"The CIA will of course cooperate fully with this investigation as it has with the others into this matter," agency spokesman Mark Mansfield said.

Mukasey named Durham the acting U.S. attorney on the case, a designation the Justice Department frequently makes when top prosecutors take themselves off a case. He will not serve as a special prosecutor like Patrick Fitzgerald, who operated autonomously while investigating the 2003 leak of a CIA operative's identity."The Justice Department went out and got somebody with complete independence and integrity,"said former Connecticut U.S. Attorney Stanley Twardy, who worked with Durham. "No politics whatsoever. It's going to be completely by the book and he's going to let the chips fall where they may."

The CIA already has agreed to open its files to congressional investigators, who have begun reviewing documents at the agency's Virginia headquarters. The House Intelligence Committee has ordered Jose Rodriguez, the former CIA official who directed the tapes be destroyed, to appear at a hearing Jan. 16.

Rodriguez's attorney, Robert S. Bennett, had no comment."He'll suck the political air right out of the investigation and just go after the facts," said Mike Clark, a retired FBI agent who investigated Rowland. "He's going to do it his way and just keep digging." He will find nothing.

In June 2005, U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy, who was overseeing a case in which
U.S.-held terror suspects were challenging their detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, ordered
the Bush administration to safeguard "all evidence and information regarding the torture,
mistreatment and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."

Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos. The recordings involved suspected terrorists Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. The Justice Department has argued to Kennedy that the videos weren't covered by his order because the two men were being held in secret CIA prisons overseas, not at Guantanamo Bay.

The tapes' destruction has riled members of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. In an opinion piece in Wednesday's New York Times, commission chairmen Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton accused the CIA of failing to respond to requests for information about the 9/11 plot.Anyone at the agency who knew about the tapes and failed to disclose them "obstructed our investigation," said Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, and Hamilton, a former Democratic House member from Indiana. The CIA has asserted that Kean and Hamilton's panel had not been specific enough in their requests and they should have asked for interrogation videos if that is what they wanted.

On Capitol Hill, the House Intelligence Committee wants to know who authorized the tapes'
destruction; who in the CIA, Justice Department and White House knew about it and when, and
why Congress was not fully informed.The committee, which had threatened to subpoena the records if they do not get access, also wants to know exactly what was shown on the tapes.

Since leaving the White House shortly before Christmas, President Bush has not addressed the
tapes' destruction. Before going to Camp David, then his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Bush said
he was confident that investigations by Congress and the Justice Department "will end up
enabling us all to find out what exactly happened."

He repeated his assertion that his "first recollection" of being told about the tapes and
their destruction was when CIA Director Michael Hayden briefed him on it in early December.

"Leaky" Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Mukasey's announcement proved that lawmakers "were right to be concerned with possible obstruction of
justice and obstruction of Congress."

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass the Mark Spitz of the senate., also lauded Mukasey's decision to launch a criminal inquiry. "The rule of law requires no less," Kennedy said. "Those tapes may have been evidence of a crime, and their destruction may have been a crime in itself." A Crime! ts a crime this hypocrite is still in publice service, may the soul of Mary Jo Kopechne rest in peace.

Sen. Joe Biden, a Delaware Democrat seeking his party's nomination for president, (fat chance) said a criminal investigation is no surprise, but suggested that Mukasey should remove himself from oversight of the investigation and appoint a special counsel "completely independent and free from political influence."

All this is a waste of taxpayer dollars, this investigation will go no where.